R. Joshua and R. Papias testified concerning the young of a peace-offering, that it could be brought as a peace-offering, whereas R. Eliezer says that the young of a peace-offering could not be brought as a peace-offering. But the Sages say: it may be brought. R. Papias said: I testify that we had a cow, a peace-offering, and we ate it as Passover, and its young we ate as a peace-offering at the [next] festival. |
עדייות 7.6 |
The same testified concerning the boards of bakers, that they are [liable to become] unclean, whereas R. Eliezer declares them not [liable to become] unclean. The same testified concerning an oven which was cut into rings and sand was put between one ring and the other ring, that it is [liable to become] unclean, whereas R. Eliezer declares it not [liable to become] unclean. The same testified that the year may be intercalated throughout the whole of Adar, whereas they used to say: only till Purim. The same testified that the year may be intercalated conditionally. There was such a case with Rabban Gamaliel who went to take authorisation from the governor in Syria and he delayed in coming back; and they intercalated the year on condition that Rabban Gamaliel should approve; and when he came back he said: I approve, and the year was thereby duly intercalated. |
עדייות 7.7 |
To subscribe
click here
To unsubscribe,
click here
To view our archived/previous mesechtos
click here
To learn about our program for Kitzur Shulchan Aruch Yomi
click here